home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nwlink.com!usenet
- From: nes@nwlink.com (Nick Schirmer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.introduction
- Subject: Re: 1950/1960 monitors: what's the difference?
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 1996 23:57:16 GMT
- Organization: Northwest Link
- Message-ID: <4d6skq$27k@texas.nwlink.com>
- References: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960107023302.622F-100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
- Reply-To: nes@nwlink.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: port13.annex4.nwlink.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- "Patrick D. Sullivan" <bob@krypton.mankato.msus.edu> wrote:
-
- >Hi; can anyone explain what the difference is between these two Commodore
- >monitors? I'm planning on using it with a Picasso II in my A2000.
-
- >Any general or specific information like dot pitch, scan rates,
- >resolution, and *reliability* would be helpful -- thanks a lot.
- (1960) It goes upto 1024x768 interlacd, and it is .28 dot pitch, which
- is better than the 1950, which is .31 dot pitch. The 1960 has been
- reliable for me, even though mine is used, and I've had it for about
- 2.5 weeks now, The manual is horible, in the respect they don't know
- what it can do (when has C= ever). Only complaint I have is that it
- doesn't go over 92ht with MonEd. (Who cares, right?) I paid $200 for
- my 1960 at a local computer store, which seems cheap in comparision
- for the ads here on the net!
-
- |
- /-----------------------------------\ | .
- |Nick Schirmer *-----* | | | |
- |NES@NWLink.com |Escom| | | | |
- |HTTP://NWLink.com/~nes |Amiga| | | | |
- | *-----* | | | |
- | | | | |
- | Travel to HTTP://WWW.AMIGA.DE | | | | |
- | or HTTP://NWLink.com/~nes/Amiga/ | | | | | |
- \-----------------------------------/ \______________________/
- Amiga SGI IBM Macintosh
- The Average IQ of each kind of computer user!
-
-